Commonwealth v. Mills, L.
Commonwealth v. Mills, L.
141 A.3d 1275; 636 Pa. 229; 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1520
(Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Com. v. Motter, D. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did not the trial court properly grant [P]etitioner’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 600, where the time form a scheduling conference to a status listing consisted of time attributable to the conventional progression of a criminal case and was not judicial “delay,” and was therefore correctly included in the calculation of the 365 days in which to bring [Petitioner to trial, and thus where more than 365 days elapsed before [Petitioner was brought to trial?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.