Lomas, R. v. Kravitz, J., Pets
Lomas, R. v. Kravitz, J., Pets
147 A.3d 517; 637 Pa. 207; 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1869; 2016 WL 4467284
(Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Lomas Sr., R. v. Kravitz, J., Aplts. (Pa. 2017)
- Com. v. Perez, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021)
- Berg, D. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018)
- Berg, D. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018)
- Berg, D. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018)
- Lomas Sr., R. v. Kravitz, J., Aplts. (Pa. 2017)
- Ross, M. v. Brooks, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:
(1) Whether, as a matter of law, the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas should have been recused from presiding over the non-jury trial due to an appearance of impropriety arising from the ongoing participation and financial interest in the litigation by a sitting member of that Court?
(2) Whether, as a matter of law, an appearance of impropriety was created when a sitting member of the Montgomery County Bench personally participated in the litigation?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.