Commonwealth v. Rash, C., Pet
Commonwealth v. Rash, C., Pet
Commonwealth v. Rash, C., Pet
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 95 WM 2016 : Respondent : : : v. : : : CHRISTIAN RASH, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.