IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

STACY PARKS MILLER, DISTRICT : No. 263 MAL 2016 ATTORNEY, : : Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : v. : : : COUNTY OF CENTRE; SEAN P. : MCGRAW; ANDREW SHUBIN, : ATTORNEY AT LAW, D/B/A/ THE LAW : OFFICE OF ANDREW SHUBIN; : BERNARD F. CANTORNA, ESQUIRE, : BRYANT & CANTORNA, P.C.; AND : JOHN DOES 1-5, : : Respondents :

STACY PARKS MILLER, DISTRICT : No. 264 MAL 2016 ATTORNEY, : : Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : v. : : : COUNTY OF CENTRE; SEAN P. : MCGRAW; ANDREW SHUBIN, : ATTORNEY AT LAW, D/B/A/ THE LAW : OFFICE OF ANDREW SHUBIN; : BERNARD F. CANTORNA, ESQUIRE, : BRYANT & CANTORNA, P.C.; AND : JOHN DOES 1-5, : : Respondents : ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Do district attorneys and their offices constitute “judicial agencies” as defined under Section 102 of the Right-to- Know-Law, 65 P.S. § 67.102?

[263 MAL 2016 and 264 MAL 2016] - 2