In Re: Amendment of Rules 3.5 and 8.2 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct
In Re: Amendment of Rules 3.5 and 8.2 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct
Opinion
Rule 3.5 Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal
A lawyer shall not:
(a) seek to influence a judge, juror, prospective juror or other official by means prohibited by law;
(b) communicate ex parte with such a person during the proceeding unless authorized to do so by law or court order;
(c) communicate with a juror or prospective juror after discharge of the jury if:
(1) the communication is prohibited by law or court order;
(2) the juror has made known to the lawyer a desire not to communicate; or
(3) the communication involves misrepresentation, coercion, duress [of] or harassment; or
(d) engage in conduct intended to disrupt a tribunal.
Comment:
[1] Many forms of improper influence upon a tribunal are proscribed by criminal law. Others are specified in the [ABA Model] Code of Judicial Conduct and/or the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct for Magisterial District Judges, with which an advocate should be familiar. A lawyer is required to avoid contributing to a violation of such provisions.
***
Rule 8.2 Statements Concerning Judges and Other Adjudicatory Officers
(a) A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, adjudicatory officer or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial or legal office.
(b) A lawyer who is a candidate for judicial office shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct and/or the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct for Magisterial District Judges, as applicable.
***
Reference
- Status
- Published