Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2016

Howard, M. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. County

Howard, M. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. County
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided December 22, 2016 · Per Curiam
164 A.3d 474; 2016 WL 7422632; 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2896 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

Howard, M. v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. County

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. AIL 10 A,3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.