Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017

Durham, P. v. Judge

Durham, P. v. Judge
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided February 28, 2017

Durham, P. v. Judge

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

PAUL DURHAM, : No. 3 WM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : JUDGE DAVID CASHMAN, : : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (providing that hybrid representation is not permitted).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.