Durham, P. v. Judge

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT PAUL DURHAM, : No. 3 WM 2017

:

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

JUDGE DAVID CASHMAN, :

:

Respondent :

ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (providing that hybrid representation is not permitted).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.