Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017

Commonwealth v. Braddock, K.

Commonwealth v. Braddock, K.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided November 20, 2017
Commonwealth v. Braddock, K.

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

M.D. Appeal Dkt. 73 MAP 2017 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 309 MAL 2017 :

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :

KATHLEEN E. BRADDOCK, : :

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by the Commonwealth, is as follows: Whether the Superior Court, relying on Commonwealth v. Giron, 155 A.3d 635 (Pa. Super. 2017), improperly expanded the illegal sentencing doctrine when it vacated Braddock’s sentence on a non-preserved constitutional issue, holding that Birchfield v. North Dakota, 136 S.Ct. 2160 (2016), rendered enhanced penalties under 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 3803-3804 illegal, even though Birchfield recognized exigent circumstances or a search warrant can still justify increased penalties for a blood test refusal?

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.