Schock, E. v. City of Lebanon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Schock, E. v. City of Lebanon, 176 A.3d 857 (Pa. 2017)
Per Curiam

Schock, E. v. City of Lebanon

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Where subsection 5(f)(2) of the Neighborhood Improvement District Act, Act of December 20, 2000, P.L. 949, No. 130 provides for veto of a final plan “[i]f 40% or more of the affected property owners within the proposed NID [neighborhood improvement district] register' their disapproval,” is the term “affected property owners within the proposed NID” limited to the owners of properties to be assessed under the plan or does the term include the owners of all properties that are within the physical boundaries of the district?

Reference

Full Case Name
Edward J. SCHOCK, Petitioner v. CITY OF LEBANON, Respondent
Status
Published