Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2018

Commonwealth v. Brooks, C., Pet

Commonwealth v. Brooks, C., Pet
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided January 3, 2018 · Per Curiam
177 A.3d 822 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

Commonwealth v. Brooks, C., Pet

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

1. Is it unconstitutional to require [Petitioner]' to register for a lifetime when said registration requirement exceeds the statutory maximum penalty for [Petitioner’s] offense?
2. Is the Adam Walsh Statute unconstitutional in requiring the [Petitioner] to register for a lifetime?

The judgment of sentence'is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Muniz, — Pa. -, 164 A.3d 1189 (2017).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.