Bayview Loan Servicing LLC v. Wicker
Bayview Loan Servicing LLC v. Wicker
178 A.3d 1289
(Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Bayview Loan Servicing LLC v. Wicker (Pa. 2019)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2018, the Petition for-Allowance of Appeal is .GRANTED, 'LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
(1) Did the Superior Court err in affirming the decision of the trial court which found the [Respondent’s] witness competent to testify and received evidence under the business records exception to the hearsay rule?
(2) As to the contested evidence received by the Court, will a grant of allocatur, here, resolve the conflict between both U.S. Bank v. Pauten-is; Boyle v. Steiman and Commonwealth Financial Systems v. Smith as to the admissibility of witness testimony at a debt collection trial?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.