AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Was President Judge Pellegrini correct in dissent that the Commonwealth Court Majority's conclusion - that the property here, acquired by the City through a public-purpose condemnation designed to assist the Commonwealth with the construction of I-95, and then held for subsequent resale, was subject to adverse possession - was mistaken and in conflict with Superior Court precedent?