Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT
Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT
Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
MARK PAUL: KLEEMAN, IN ESSE AND : No. 155 MM 2018 SUI JURIS, CLAIMANT IN LAW, : : Petitioner : : : v. : : : ERIC M. SCHRANTZ, IN HIS OFFICIAL : AND PRIVATE CAPACITY AND THE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : T/D/B/A DEPARTMENT OF : TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF : DRIVER'S LICENSING, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for “Writ of Mandamus in the Nature of Equity” is DENIED.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.