S.B. v. Steamships
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- N.E.G. v. J.Z.M. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2026)
- In re: Estate of Klingensmith, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2025)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
the King's Bench Application, filed in this Court, where the trial court lacked jurisdiction to make such an award and where the award was not based in law or fact?
The decision of the Superior Court is REVERSED IN PART to the extent that it affirmed the trial court's March 16, 2017 award of counsel fees to Respondent for having to answer Petitioner's king's bench application. The March 16, 2017 order of the trial court is VACATED IN PART, to the extent that the trial court awarded $3092.50 in counsel fees to Respondent for fees incurred in responding to Petitioner's king's bench application. Pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 2744, an appellate court, not a trial court, has authority to award reasonable counsel fees if the appellate court determines that an appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See Thunberg v. Strause,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.