In the Interest of: N.B.-A., of: E.A.
In the Interest of: N.B.-A., of: E.A.
208 A.3d 59
(Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In the Interest of: N.B.-A. Appeal of: E.A. (Pa. 2020)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
(1) Did the Superior Court err by affirming the trial court's finding that Mother was a perpetrator of child abuse in the absence of clear and convincing evidence that she intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly caused or created a likelihood of sexual abuse through a recent act or failure to act?
(2) Did the Superior Court commit an error of law by applying 23 Pa.C.S. § 6381(d) to find that DHS established a prima facie case that Mother was responsible for the abuse perpetrated against N.B.-A. where another individual had been identified as the direct perpetrator?
(3) Did the Superior Court commit an abuse of discretion by finding that Mother failed to rebut the prima facie presumption that she was a perpetrator of child abuse pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S. § 6381(d)?
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.