Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2019

Johnson, Pets v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg

Johnson, Pets v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided May 30, 2019

Johnson, Pets v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

EDELLA JOHNSON (A/K/A EDELLA : No. 11 WAL 2019 ROBINSON A/K/A EDELLA ROBINSON : JOHNSON) , ERIC JOHNSON, : INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED FORMER : the Order of the Superior Court AND CURRENT HOMEOWNERS IN : PENNSYLVANIA, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : PHELAN HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLP, : : Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity is: Did the Superior Court err in determining the mortgage at issue was not a “residential mortgage” and that petitioners are therefore not entitled to seek damages pursuant to 41 P.S. §§406 and 502?

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.