Ra-Bey, T. v. Phila. Dept. of Prisons
Ra-Bey, T. v. Phila. Dept. of Prisons
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
TETI AMUN RA-BEY EX RELATIONE : No. 5 EM 2020 [SMITH, CARL], : : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF : PRISONS I.E. [PHILADELPHIA : INDUSTRIAL CORRECTIONS CENTER] : D/B/A WARDEN MICHELLE FERRELL : PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON : PLEAS D/B/A TIMIKA LANE, JUDGE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : D/B/A ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY : MIKE MCFARLAND, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2020, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the “Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum” are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.