Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2020

St. Fleur v. City of Scranton

St. Fleur v. City of Scranton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided June 22, 2020

St. Fleur v. City of Scranton

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

GARY ST. FLEUR, NICHOLAS GETTEL, : No. 26 MM 2020 CASEY DURKIN, DAMIAN BIANCERELLI, : RICH JOHNSON, ETHAN GREEN, : ANGELA GILGALLON, AND MICHELE : MCGOVERN, : : Respondents : : v. : : THE CITY OF SCRANTON, PAIGE : COGNETTI, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY : AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SCRANTON, : AND PATRICK SHERIDAN, IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS BUSINESS : ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF : SCRANTON, : : Petitioners : : ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2020, the Application “for Leave to File Response in Support of the Petition for Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 726, or in the Alternative, King’s Bench Jurisdiction,” the Application “for Leave to File Nunc Pro Tunc a Notice of Intent to File Amicus Brief and in Support of Petitioner’s Petition for Extraordinary or King’s Bench Jurisdiction,” and the Application “for Leave to File a Response in Support of the Petition for Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 726 or in the alternative, King’s Bench Jurisdiction” are GRANTED.

The “Petition for Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42 Pa.C.S. §726, or in the Alternative, King’s Bench Jurisdiction” is DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.