Babb, T., M.D. v. Geisinger Pet: Geisinger
Babb, T., M.D. v. Geisinger Pet: Geisinger
Opinion
M.D. Appeal Dkt.
48 - 2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
TERRENCE E. BABB, M.D. : No. 24 MAL 2020 : : v. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court : GEISINGER CLINIC; PENN STATE : GEISINGER HEALTH SYSTEM; ROBIN E. : OLIVER, M.D.; AND MICHAEL : CHMIELEWSKI, M.D. TERRENCE E. : BABB, M.D. : : : v. : : : GEISINGER CLINIC; GEISINGER HEALTH : SYSTEM : : : PETITION OF: GEISINGER CLINIC :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court and trial court erroneously permitted the presumption of at-will employment to be rebutted by a mere preponderance of the evidence, as opposed to by clear and direct evidence, in conflict with established precedent?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.