Patterson, F. v. Tice, E.
Patterson, F. v. Tice, E.
Patterson, F. v. Tice, E.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
FLOYD E. PATTERSON, JR., : No. 120 MM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : ERIC TICE, SUPERINTENDENT, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 19th day of October, 2020, the “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum” and the “Motion for the Immediate Relief” are DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.