Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2022

Bowfin KeyCon Hldgs. v. DEP

Bowfin KeyCon Hldgs. v. DEP
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 12, 2022 · Per Curiam

Bowfin KeyCon Hldgs. v. DEP

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT BOWFIN KEYCON HOLDINGS, LLC; CHIEF : No. 82 MAP 2022 POWER FINANCE II, LLC; CHIEF POWER : TRANSFER PARENT, LLC; KEYCON : POWER HOLDINGS, LLC; GENON : HOLDINGS, INC.; PENNSYLVANIA COAL : ALLIANCE; UNITED MINE WORKERS OF : AMERICA; INTERNATIONAL : BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL : WORKERS; AND INTERNATIONAL : BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS, : IRON SHIP BUILDERS, BLACKSMITHS, : FORGERS AND HELPERS : : v. : : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND : PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL : QUALITY BOARD : : : APPEAL OF: CONSTELLATION ENERGY : CORPORATION AND CONSTELLATION : ENERGY GENERATION, LLP, : : Possible Intervenors : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2022, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED.

See In re Barnes Foundation, 871 A.2d 792, 794 (Pa. 2005) (“Pennsylvania law does allow for an appeal as of right from an order denying intervention in circumstances that meet the requirements of the collateral order doctrine.”); Geniviva v. Frisk, 725 A.2d 1209, 1214 (Pa. 1999) (explaining that, for a right to be too important to be denied review for purposes of the collateral order doctrine, the right must be “deeply rooted in public policy going beyond the particular litigation at hand”).

The Combined Application to Consolidate and Expedite Appeals and the Motion to Quash are DISMISSED as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.