Perry, J. v. Judge
Perry, J. v. Judge
Perry, J. v. Judge
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
JAMAR BLAINE PERRY, : No. 49 WM 2023 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : JUDGE JOHN D. MCBRIDE, JUDGE : KIM TESLA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY : JOHN LEE BROWN, DISTRICT : ATTORNEY AHMED AZIZ AND : PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY : GENERAL, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2023, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the names of the jurists from the caption.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.