IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 646 MAL 2023 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : GARY L. CAIN, JR., : : Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. The “Application for Leave to Amend for Relief Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123 Seeking the Immeadiate [sic] Removal of Ineffective PCRA Counsel Pursuant to Commonwealth v. Bradley, 237 A.3d 1068 Pa. Super 2020 [sic] at the First Opportunity, and Remand to Relitigate Claims Waived by PCRA Counsel in the Superior Court during Litigation of Appellants [sic] PCRA Appeal to Ensure Appellant’s ‘Rule-Based’ Right to Effective PCRA Counsel”, treated as an application to amend, is GRANTED. The “Application for Relief Seeking the Immediate Removal of Ineffective PCRA counsel pursuant to Commonwealth v. Bradley, 261 A.3d 381 (Pa. 2021),” “Application for Relief Seeking Leave to Supplement the Immediate Removal of Ineffective PCRA Counsel Pursuant to Commonwealth v. Bradley, 261 A.3d 381 (Pa. 20[21]),” and “Amended Application for Relief Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123 Seeking the Immediate Removal of Ineffective PCRA Counsel Pursuant to Commonwealth v. Bradley, 237 A.3d 1068 Pa. Super 2020 [sic] at the First Opportunity, and Remand to Relitigate Claims Waived by PCRA Counsel in the Superior Court during Litigation of Appellant’s PCRA Appeal to Ensure Appellant’s ‘Rule-Based’ Right to Effective PCRA Counsel” are all DENIED.

[646 MAL 2023] - 2