Hon. Roberts v. St Employees Retirement Brd
Hon. Roberts v. St Employees Retirement Brd
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
HON. JOSHUA H. ROBERTS; HON. MARY : No. 136 MM 2023 C. MCGINLEY; HON. NICOLA HENRY- : TAYLOR; HON. SABRINA KORBEL; HON. : LISA G. MIDDLEMAN; HON. TIFFANY E. : SIZEMORE; HON. WRENNA L. WATSON; : AND HON. DAVID H. CONROY, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : PENNSYLVANIA STATE EMPLOYEES' : RETIREMENT BOARD; DAVID R. : FILLMAN; GLENN E. BECKER; HON. JOHN : M. DISANTO; HON. DAN B. FRANKEL; : STACY GARRITY; HON. VINCENT J. : HUGHES; GREGORY K. JORDAN; HON. : PAUL SCHEMEL; MARY A. SODERBERG; : GREGORY C. THALL; AND RICHARD : VAGUE, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES : AS MEMBERS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA : STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT : BOARD, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2024, the Application for Leave to File Reply is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Permission to Appeal Interlocutory Order under Pa.R.A.P. 1311(b) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b)” is DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.