Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas, 1793

Cavode v. M'Kelvey

Cavode v. M'Kelvey
Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas · Decided March 15, 1793
1 Add. 56

Counsel

Woods, for the defendant., Brackenridge, for the plaintiff.

Cavode v. M'Kelvey

Opinion of the Court

President.

In assumsit on a wager, “whether a decree in the court of Chancery would be reversed, on appeal to the house of Lords,” it was contended, that the event was not contingent, but certain ; for the law is clear, evident, and certain. But it was held, that the consideration was good, and the action lay. Settlement of a dispute is part of the consideration in this case, and *58seems to be the principal consideration in the view of the parties : that has not failed. There appears no fraud, nor concealment of circumstances, not equally in the knowledge of both parties.

There was a verdict for the defendant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.