District Court, D. Puerto Rico, 2026

Evelyn R.C. v. Commissioner of Social Security

Evelyn R.C. v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · Decided May 27, 2026
Evelyn R.C. v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO Evelyn R.C.1, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL NO. 26-1007 (GLS) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

ORDER Plaintiff Evelyn R.C. filed a Complaint seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits. Docket No. 3. On January 9, 2026, this case was referred to the undersigned for disposition. Docket Nos. 8-9. On April 27, 2026, the Commissioner moved the Court to enter an order reversing its final decision and remanding Plaintiff Evelyn R.C.’s case to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Docket No. 16. The Court granted the Commissioner’s request and entered Judgment remanding Plaintiff’s disability insurance benefits claim for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Docket Nos. 17-18.

On May 13, 2026, Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney’s fees in the amount of $6,923.93 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Docket No. 19. Under section 2412(d)(1)(A) of the EAJA, a court shall award to a prevailing party, other than the United States, fees and other expenses incurred by that party in any civil action brought by or against the United States in any court having jurisdiction of that action, unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). Eligibility for a fee award in any civil action under the EAJA requires: (1) that the claimant be a “prevailing party;” (2) that the Government’s position was not “substantially justified;” (3) that no special circumstances make an award unjust; and (4) that any fee application be submitted to the court within 30 days of final Plaintiff’s last name is omitted for privacy reasons. judgment, supported by an itemized statement as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B). See Comm’r I.N.S. v. Jean, 496 U.S. 154, 158 (1990).

On May 15, 2026, the Commissioner filed a motion advising the Court that Plaintiff agreed to an attorney’s fee in the amount of $6,300.00 under the EAJA. Docket No. 20. Plaintiff requests that the fees be paid directly to Plaintiff’s attorney, if Plaintiff does not have any debt with the Federal Government that would be subject to offset under the U.S. Treasury Program. Docket No. 19. Plaintiff claims that she complied with all the statutory requirements under the EAJA for the award of attorney’s fees. Id. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees against the United States of America in the amount of $6,300.00.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 27th day of May 2026.

s/Giselle López-Soler GISELLE LÓPEZ-SOLER United States Magistrate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.