Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1923

R. Boak & Co. v. Armstrong & Co.

R. Boak & Co. v. Armstrong & Co.
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · Decided April 13, 1923
31 P.R. 915

R. Boak & Co. v. Armstrong & Co.

Opinion of the Court

District Court of Ponce.

Whbeeas, The only errors assigned by the appellant are: (1) That the court erred in weighing the evidence and dismissing the complaint; (2) that the court erred in holding by its judgment that the law and the facts were in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, and (3) that the court erred in imposing the costs and attorney’s fees upon the plaintiff;

*916Whereas, The questions' so raised are rather questions of fact than of law;

Whereas, 'After a careful examination of the record in the light of the appellant’s brief and of the oral and written pleadings of the appellee, we find no abuse of discretion or such manifest error as to require a reversal or modification of the judgment;

Therefore, The judgment of March 10, 1922, is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.