People v. Cortés
People v. Cortés
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The appellant was convicted of carrying a revolver and in his appeal from that judgment alleged that the evidence had been erroneously weighed and he should not have been convicted.
The judgment appealed from shows that the conflict in the evidence as to whether or not the appellant was carrying the revolver on leaving the store was adjusted by the trial court in favor of the prosecution, but we see in that no manifest error and therefore can not hold that the evidence was weighed erroneously.
The revolver must have appeared to be in good condition for the appellant bought it and went in search of cartridges with which to load it, yet the seller testified that it had the cylinder, but some pieces were missing; therefore application can be made of the citation in People v. Alonso, 35 P.R.R. 435, in which it was held that a pistol does not cease to be one by becoming temporarily inefficient or because it is unloaded, for as long as it has the general characteristics of a pistol and the appearance of one it is a pistol.
The citation made by the appellant of People v. Ortega, 35 P.R.R. 715, is not applicable to the present case, because the appellant was not unaware of carrying a revolver; nor' is the case of People v. Almodóvar, 35 P.R.R. 838, applicable because the appellant did not carry the revolver for the same purpose as in that case.
The judgment appealed from must be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.