Thus we see that in Rivera v. Cámara, 17 P.R.R. 503, which involved an appeal from a decision denying' a motion to set aside the appointment of a judicial administrator, it was said:

“Such decision is appealable because it has adjudicated definitely the question of whether or not the judicial administrator may be appointed at the instance of Ignacio Rivera over the objection made by Cámara to. such appointment.” (p. 507.)

In Díaz et al. v. Cividanes, 23 P.R.R. 787, an appeal was taken from a decision denying the appointment of a judicial administrator. The court reversed the decision, but the question as to whether the decision was ap-pealable was not raised. The same happened in Sabater v. Escudero, 23. P.R.R. 794.

In Martínez v. Crosas, 25 P.R.R. 735, it was said:

“Without considering whether the said order is appealable or not,, [appointment of judicial administrator] we are of the opinion that if ap-pealable it would be only in one single aspect.” (p. 737.)

In In re Franceschi, 44 P.R.R. 624, although it treated of the appointment of an arbitrator within an administration proceeding', this Court said that such appointment did not fall within the purview of subdivision 3 of § 295 because it was not a special order made after final judgment, inasmuch as the appointment of a judicial administrator is not a judgment definitely terminating the judicial administration.

In Ex parte Rivera, 53 P.R.R. 382, it was held that the judgment which puts an end to the administration proceeding is the final order, either approving the account as rendered by the administrator or modifying it.

And, lastly, in Ex parte Detrés, 66 P.R.R. 476, we held that an order-appointing a judicial administrator has the character of a final decision *545rendered in a special proceeding and is appealable under the provisions of subdivision 1 of § 295 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Section 295 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides:

“Section 295. — An appeal may be taken to the Supreme Court from • a District Court:

“1. Prom a final judgment in an action or special proceeding commenced in the court in which the same is rendered, within one month after the entry of judgment.

“2. Prom a judgment rendered on an appeal from an inferior court, within fifteen days after the entry of such judgment, should the value of the property claimed or amount of the judgment not including products and interest thereon exceed three hundred dollars ($300).

“3. Prom an order granting or refusing a new trial; from an order granting or dissolving an injunction; from an order refusing to grant or dissolve an injunction; from an order dissolving or refusing to dissolve an attachment; from an order granting or refusing to grant a change of the place of trial; from any special order made after final judgment; and from an interlocutory judgment in actions for partition of real property, within ten days after the order or interlocutory judgment is made and entered on the minutes of the court or filed with the secretary.”

Sections 564 and 590 of our Code of Civil Procedure, respectively, provide:

“Section 564. — On the day and hour designated in the summons the judge after hearing', in person or by their counsel, the parties who appear, shall appoint an administrator. The judge may appoint the surviving spouse, or the party having the largest interest in the inheritance or in the estate, if he or she have the necessary capacity for the discharge of the duties of administrator, or if such capacity be wanting, or if the interest of all be equal, or objections be made to such appointment, the judge shall appoint a stranger of well-known integrity and capacity.”

“Section 590. — The district court shall make a final order, either approving the account as rendered, or modifying and amending it, and charging the executor or administrator as law may require, and an appeal may be taken from such final order.”

■And ⅜⅜ 975 and 1014 of the Law of Civil Procedure for Cuba and Puerto Rico of 1885 provide:

“Sec. 975. — In such cases, should there be a surviving spouse, who was cohabiting with the deceased at the time of death, the same shall be appointed depositary-administrator, and as soon as an inventory of the property has been made, it shall be delivered to said depositary-administrator as such, removing the seals and locks as the delivery is made.

“No bond shall be required when, in the judgment of the judge, the said depositary administrator has sufficient property of his or her own to guarantee that which does not belong to him or her. Otherwise he or she must furnish security in such sum as the judge may fix.

“If there be no surviving spouse with legal capacity to administer the property, this office shall be given to another person, and the provisions of articles 966 and 967 shall be observed.” (War Department Translation)

“Section 1014. — If the accounts should be impugned at the proper time, said objections shall be heard and determined before the administrator, according to the procedure prescribed for incidental issues.

“Prom the ruling terminating this issue an appeal may he taken both for review and a stay of proceedings. From that rendered by the au-diencia an appeal for annulment of judgment lies.” (Italics ours.) (War Department Translation)