Superior Court of Rhode Island, 1917

Feinberg v. Taylor

Feinberg v. Taylor
Superior Court of Rhode Island · Decided October 17, 1917 · Tanner
1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 4

Counsel

For complainant: A. S. & A. P. Johnson., For respondent: Wilson, Gardner & Churchill and H. B. Agard.

Feinberg v. Taylor

Opinion of the Court

TANNER, P. J.

This case is heard upon the petition of the creditor that the receiver be ordered to pay the dividend ordered by the Court without requiring from the creditor a release against said trust estate or the *5trustees thereof, or any other conditions attached to .the payment of said dividend.

For complainant: A. S. & A. P. Johnson. For respondent: Wilson, Gardner & Churchill and H. B. Agard.

The decree upon which the receiver tendered payment does not appear to be a final decree releasing the receiver or the trust estate from all liability. In the absence of such a decree we do not think that the receiver can require any such release as he has insisted upon in the case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.