Superior Court of Rhode Island, 1918

Grattage v. Grattage

Grattage v. Grattage
Superior Court of Rhode Island · Decided December 10, 1918 · Tanner
2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 12

Counsel

For petitioner: Quinn and McKiernan., For respondent: Cooney and Cahill.

Grattage v. Grattage

Opinion of the Court

RESCRIPT

TANNER, P. J,

The respondent seeks to void the decree allowing the eompalinant temporary alimony by producing an agreement for separation between the parties, in which for the consideration of $75 the complainant agreed to waive her rights to support.

Such agreements are valid if fair and reasonable. We are of the opinion, however, that the sum of $75 was a merely nominal consideration and by no means adequate.

The motion to modify the decree is therefore denied.

Commonwealth of Penn. vs. Smith, 13 Penn. Superior Court, 358.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.