Superior Court of Rhode Island, 1928

Caron v. Gosselin

Caron v. Gosselin
Superior Court of Rhode Island · Decided October 8, 1928 · Blodgett
5 R.I. Dec. 29

Counsel

For plaintiffs: John R. Higgins., For defendant: Ralph T. Bamefield.

Caron v. Gosselin

Opinion of the Court

BLODGETT, J

Heard upon motion of plaintiff for a new trial after verdicts of a jury for Alfred Caron, Jr., for $1500 and for Alfred Caron Sr., for $1200.

The motions are urged upon the ground that the verdicts were inadequate.

The boy was seriously injured and the damages though small are not so *30inadequate as to shock the conscience of the Court.

For plaintiffs: John R. Higgins. For defendant: Ralph T. Bamefield.

Motions denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.