Superior Court of Rhode Island, 1932

McKendall v. Weisman

McKendall v. Weisman
Superior Court of Rhode Island · Decided June 10, 1932 · Frost
8 R.I. Dec. 324

Counsel

For plaintiff: Harlow & Boudreau., For defendants: Sallet & Ress.

McKendall v. Weisman

Opinion of the Court

FROST, J.

Heard on plaintiff’s motion for new trial after verdict for defendant.

This is an action brought to recover on four promissory notes against tbe four makers and tbe two endorsers thereof. It was tried with another action on promissory notes between tbe same parties, numbered 63577.

Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is granted for tbe reasons expressed in rescript filed in No. 63577.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.