Superior Court of Rhode Island, 1932

Roggermoser v. Niles

Roggermoser v. Niles
Superior Court of Rhode Island · Decided July 18, 1932 · Capotosto
9 R.I. Dec. 19

Counsel

Plaintiff’s attorney: Howard K. Simmons., Defendant’s attorneys: Messrs. Gilmartin & Toole.

Roggermoser v. Niles

Opinion of the Court

CAPOTOSTO, J.

Alienation of affection. Verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff moves for a new trial, claiming that the verdict is against the evidence.

The plaintiff succeeded in raising a mere doubt as to the propriety of conduct between the defendant and Mrs. Roggermoser if one were inclined to *20be suspicious. The testimony does not warrant a verdict for the plaintiff. A mother of eight children, ranging in age from 20 to 6 years, should not be condemned upon conjecture, especially when the father is proven indolent, intemperate and inconsiderate. The jury’s verdict is just.

Plaintiff’s attorney: Howard K. Simmons. Defendant’s attorneys: Messrs. Gilmartin & Toole.

Motion for new trial denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.