Superior Court of Rhode Island, 1933

Peters v. United Electric Railways Co.

Peters v. United Electric Railways Co.
Superior Court of Rhode Island · Decided October 4, 1933 · Churchill
10 R.I. Dec. 88

Counsel

For plaintiff: Hogan & Hogan., For defendant: Clifford Whipple,' Earl Sweeney'.

Peters v. United Electric Railways Co.

Opinion of the Court

CHURCHILL, J.

Heard on motion to file additional count.

Inasmuch as the plaintiff did not accompany her motion with a copy of the proposed additional count, or otherwise give the substance of the proposed count, the Court is unable to rule on the matter.

The motion is therefore denied but without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to renew such motion when accompanied by a copy of the proposed additional count.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.