Gardiner v. Woodmansee
Gardiner v. Woodmansee
2 R.I. 558
Gardiner v. Woodmansee
Opinion of the Court
I therefore report. that the conditional tender was a proper one and sufficient in amount, and that the condition of the mortgage was complied with.
But if the Court should be of opinion that interest was properly due from the date of said Catherine’s death to the actual payment, (as the plaintiff contends) there will then be due the sum of $304 16, being $334 16, less the $27 50 paid.”
Exceptions overruled, andfihe report confirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.