Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1875

Gilligan v. Aldermen of Providence

Gilligan v. Aldermen of Providence
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Decided December 27, 1875 · Dureee
11 R.I. 258; 1875 R.I. LEXIS 35

Counsel

Charles H. Parkhurst, for petitioner. Nicholas Van Slyck, City Solicitor, for board of aldermen.

Gilligan v. Aldermen of Providence

Opinion of the Court

Dureee, C. J.

We think the words “ any.abutting owner,” as used in Gen. Stat. R. I. cap. 60, § 38, are comprehensive enough to include a tenant for life or years, or from year to year, of the abutting estate, as well as the owner of the fee. A lessee is an owner pro tanto of the estate which is leased to him. This construction, moreover, is in keeping with the meaning which obviously belongs to the word “ owner,” in Gen. Stat. R. I. cap. 59, § 4 (as see cap. 59, § 6), and with the rule of construction given in cap. 22, § 9. We grant the writ of mandamus. Petition granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.