Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1877

Mowry v. Kerrins

Mowry v. Kerrins
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Decided June 11, 1877 · PER CURIAM.
11 R.I. 556; 1877 R.I. LEXIS 42

Counsel

Elisha C. Mowry, for plaintiff. A.J. Cushing, for defendant.

Mowry v. Kerrins

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Motion to amend a plea in abatement. The plaintiff, who demurs to the plea, contends that it cannot be amended.

*557 Elisha O. Mowry, for plaintiff. A. J. Cushing, for defendant.

The same point was before the court in Hoppin & Wife v. Jenckes, 9 R. I. 102, 106, and was there argued by able counsel and many authorities cited. The court there decided to allow the amendment.

Our statute allowing amendments is very broad in its provisions, and although pleas in abatement are called in the books dilatory pleas, they sometimes, under our practice, present very important questions. We think the present case is a proper one for the exercise of the discretion of the court.

Motion granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.