Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1894

Brown v. Armstrong

Brown v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Decided March 28, 1894 · PER CURIAM.
30 A. 461; 18 R.I. 537; 1894 R.I. LEXIS 68

Counsel

George J. West, for petitioner. Warren R. Perce, for respondents.

Brown v. Armstrong

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the- assignee being a grantee in the conveyances made by Charles H. Armstrong alleged to he fraudulent, is an unsuitable person for the office of assignee, since his interest as a grantee is necessarily. in conflict with his duty as assignee. The prayer of the petition for his removal is, therefore, granted. The petition will stand for further hearing on the question of the appointment of a receiver, or assignee, in the place of the said John R. Armstrong.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.