Baker v. Hoxie

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Baker v. Hoxie, 38 A. 1000 (R.I. 1897)
20 R.I. 331; 1897 R.I. LEXIS 124
Matteson, Stiness, Tillingliast

Baker v. Hoxie

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Harris v. Earle, Ex. &c., 1370, April term, 1889, holds that under Pub. Stat. R. I. cap. 221, § 8, this court may grant a trial in this court in a case in which the party has neglected to prosecute his appeal from the judgment of commissioners on an insolvent estate.

We do not think that the charges of fraud and conspiracy on which the present petition rests are established. If the petitioners are able to amend their petition so as to show a *332 sufficient reason for the non-prosecution of the appeal, of which notice was given by their attorney, we will entertain a motion for that purpose.

Charles H. Page and Franklin P. Owen, for petitioner. Walter B. Vincent, for respondents.

We think, too, that the person whose claim the petitioners desire to contest should also be made a party to the petition.

Reference

Full Case Name
Catherine Baker Et Al. vs. William Hoxie, Administrator
Status
Published