Chace v. Pidge
Chace v. Pidge
Opinion of the Court
This is a petition for a mechanic’s lien under Gen. Laws E. I. cap. 206, § 1. The work done and the materials furnished were so done and furnished at the request of the respondent Pidge, who was the owner of the land on which the house was constructed, without written contract; and therefore the petitioner, under the provisions of § 5 of cap. 206, had six months within which to commence legal process to enforce the lien. The materials, which consisted of two furnaces and pipes, were furnished, as appears hv the account lodged with the notice of lien, on August 27, 1897, and the account and notice of lien were lodged on February 19, 1898. In the interval between these dates Pidge conveyed the house and land to the respondent Augustus C. .Purdy. In the notice of lien the respondent Pidge is named as the owner of the land, and the question is made whether the notice of lien should not have named the respondent Purdy, who then owned the land, as the owner, and claimed the lien against his estate therein.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- S. Frank Chace vs. Samuel S. Pidge Et Al.
- Status
- Published