Prefontaine v. Roberge
Prefontaine v. Roberge
39 A. 758; 20 R.I. 418; 1898 R.I. LEXIS 80
Prefontaine v. Roberge
Opinion of the Court
We think that the defendant’s exceptions relating to the allowance by the auditor of moneys paid by the plaintiff on the joint account of himself and the defendant, on the ground that such moneys were not mentioned in the declaration, were well taken ; but we think that the plaintiff may be permitted, on motion, to amend his declaration in respect to the sums allowed. Spicers & Peckham, v. Harvey, 9 R. I. 582.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.