Prefontaine v. Roberge
Prefontaine v. Roberge
39 A. 758; 20 R.I. 418; 1898 R.I. LEXIS 80
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Garber v. Whittaker (Superior Court of Delaware 1934)
- Hamilton v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. (8th Cir. 1924)
- Salem Traction Co. v. Anson (Or. 1902)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We think that the defendant’s exceptions relating to the allowance by the auditor of moneys paid by the plaintiff on the joint account of himself and the defendant, on the ground that such moneys were not mentioned in the declaration, were well taken ; but we think that the plaintiff may be permitted, on motion, to amend his declaration in respect to the sums allowed. Spicers & Peckham, v. Harvey, 9 R. I. 582.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.