Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1898

Vernon v. Reynolds

Vernon v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Decided June 1, 1898 · Matteson, Stiness, Tillingliast
40 A. 419; 20 R.I. 552; 1898 R.I. LEXIS 116

Vernon v. Reynolds

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Though the general rule is that all persons interested in the subject-matter of the suit should be made parties, an exception is allowed where the parties are numerous. In such case a bill may be filed by one or more complainants in his or their behalf, and in behalf of all others interested who may come in and take on themselves the prosecution of the suit. 1 Dan. Ch. Pr., 6 Am. ed. *p. 216, note 6; Adams Eq. 5 Am. Ed. *pp. 320-21, and note 1; Story Eq. PI. & Pr., 10 ed. § 97. The bill in the present *553 case comes within this exception. Our opinion is, therefore, that it is sufficient, and that the plea of want of parties should be overruled.

Charles Acton Ives, for complainants. Samuel B. Honey, for respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.