Vine v. Vine

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Vine v. Vine, 42 A. 871 (R.I. 1899)
21 R.I. 190; 1899 R.I. LEXIS 23
Matteson, Stiness, Tillinghast

Vine v. Vine

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

^ By Gen. Laws R. I. cap. 222, § 4, cap. 195, § 14, exclusive jurisdiction in divorce and incidental matters arising therein is vested in the Appellate Division of this court. We are of the opinion, therefore, that no action can be .maintained in any other court to recover an allowance made to a wife for her support during the pendency of the petition for divorce, but that recourse must be had to the remedies prescribed by the rule of this Division.

*191 Dennis J. Holland, for plaintiff. Franklin P. Oiuen and John P. Beagan, for defendant.

Moreover, a decree for an allowance penclente lite is an interlocutory decree, subject to revocation or modification at any time by tbe court which made it, and consequently cannot be the foundation of an action as upon a final judgment. i Wait’s Actions and Defences, 187, § 5.

Reference

Full Case Name
Sarah L. Vine v. George Vine.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published