Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1899

The Ostby Barton Co. v. Goldman

The Ostby Barton Co. v. Goldman
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Decided April 28, 1899 · Matteson, Stiness, Tillingliast
43 A. 101; 21 R.I. 280; 1899 R.I. LEXIS 44

The Ostby Barton Co. v. Goldman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

(1) The defendant pleads the pendency of an action against him in Massachusetts for the same cause upon which this action is based. The mere pendency of a suit in one State cannot be pleaded in abatement or in bar of a second action in another State between the same parties for the same cause of action. Black. Judg. § 865 and cases cited; Stanton v. Embry, 93 U. S. 548; Allen v. Watt, 69 Ill. 655 ; *281 Cole v. Flitcraft, 47 Md. 312; Paine v. Schenectady Co., 11 R. I. 411.

Cooke & Angelí, for plaintiff. Page <& Page, for defendant.

Plaintiff’s demurrer to plea of Us penclens sustained.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.