The Ostby Barton Co. v. Goldman

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
The Ostby Barton Co. v. Goldman, 43 A. 101 (R.I. 1899)
21 R.I. 280; 1899 R.I. LEXIS 44
Matteson, Stiness, Tillingliast

The Ostby Barton Co. v. Goldman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

(1) The defendant pleads the pendency of an action against him in Massachusetts for the same cause upon which this action is based. The mere pendency of a suit in one State cannot be pleaded in abatement or in bar of a second action in another State between the same parties for the same cause of action. Black. Judg. § 865 and cases cited; Stanton v. Embry, 93 U. S. 548; Allen v. Watt, 69 Ill. 655 ; *281 Cole v. Flitcraft, 47 Md. 312; Paine v. Schenectady Co., 11 R. I. 411.

Cooke & Angelí, for plaintiff. Page <& Page, for defendant.

Plaintiff’s demurrer to plea of Us penclens sustained.

Reference

Full Case Name
The Ostby & Barton Company vs. William J. Goldman
Status
Published