Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1902

Rosendale v. McNulty

Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Decided January 8, 1902 · Stiness, Tillingliast, Rogers

50 A. 850; 23 R.I. 465; 1902 R.I. LEXIS 135

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Pari (R.I. 1981)
Kiszkiel v. Gwiazda (Conn. 1978)
State v. Hasney (R.I. 1975)
In re Berman (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)
Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. Bailey (Tex. App. 1914)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

(1) The defendant, Mary McNulty, has refused to answer questions put to her in taking her-deposition, upon the ground that her answers would criminate herself. The questions do not show that such a result would be possible, and hence the questions should have been answered. A writ of attachment against said Mary McNulty will issue, unless at such time as shall be fixed by the master, within *466 twenty days from this date, she shall appear before him and answer the questions which she refused to answer and shall also within that time pay the costs upon this citation, to he taxed by the clerk, and an additional sum of ten dollars for counsel’s fee for complainant’s counsel, which sums are not to he recovered back in any event.

T. M. O’Reilly, for complainants. J. M. Brennan, for respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.