Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1903

State v. Hunt

State v. Hunt
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Decided March 18, 1903 · Stiness, Tillmghast, Douglas
54 A. 773; 25 R.I. 69; 1903 R.I. LEXIS 9

State v. Hunt

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

(1) The only ruling of the court to which the defendant excepted is the refusal to charge that “the jury must find that the bullet went in the direction of the said Herbert W. Root or there can be no assault with a dangerous weapon.” It is clear that'this refusal was right. “An assault consists in an, offer to do bodily harm, made by a person who is in a position to inflict it,” as the court below charged. The accuracy or inaccuracy of aim does not determine guilt or innocence of the offence.

The evidence may properly have left in the minds of the jury a reasonable doubt of the commission of the whole offence charged in the indictment, but it fully justified their verdict that the defendant was guilty of simple assault.

Petition for new trial denied, and case remitted to the Common Pleas Division for sentence.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.