Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1941

Kimball v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Decided February 20, 1941 · Baker, Capotosto, Condon, Flynn, Moss

66 R.I. 169

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

After the filing of our opinion the complainant, by leave of court, filed a motion for reargument. We *170have carefully considered said motion and the reasons- assigned therefor.

Charles R. Easton, for complainant. James J. Fogarty, Jr., Voigt, Wright, Munroe & Clason, for respondents.

However, as the motion contains no matter which was not fully considered and passed upon before the filing of our opinion, the motion is denied and dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.