Payne v. Superior Court
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Bruce Brayman Builders, Inc. v. James M. Lamphere, in his capacity as Town Planner for the Town of Hopkinton (R.I. 2015)
- Richardson v. Smith (R.I. 1997)
- Lefranc v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company, 93-2830 (1996) (Superior Court of Rhode Island 1996)
- Paradis v. Heritage Loan and Investment Company, 90-7592 (1996) (Superior Court of Rhode Island 1996)
- Leone v. Town of New Shoreham (R.I. 1987)
- Taveira v. Solomon (R.I. 1987)
- Goodman v. Turner (R.I. 1986)
- Salvadore v. Major Electric & Supply, Inc. (R.I. 1983)
- Sevigny v. City of Biddeford (Me. 1975)
- Columbus Ornamental Iron Works, Inc. v. Martin (R.I. 1968)
- Bailey v. Bailey (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)
- Epperson v. Epperson (Fla. 1958)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Mary Dexter PAYNE et al.
v.
The SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF PROVIDENCE.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
Everett D. Higgins, Harold E. Staples, Edwin H. Hastings, all of Providence, for petitioners.
William E. Powers, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Coogan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
William E. McCabe, City Sol., James J. Corrigan, Asst. City Sol., Providence, for City of Providence.
PER CURIAM.
After our decision in the above case the petitioners asked and received permission to file a motion for reargument. Pursuant to this permission they have filed such a motion, setting out therein certain reasons on which they base their contention that justice requires a reargument of the case. *168 We have carefully considered those reasons and we are of the opinion that they are without merit.
Motion denied.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.