Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1971

Balme v. Gold-Bro, Inc.

Balme v. Gold-Bro, Inc.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Decided May 13, 1971 · No. 1406-M. P
277 A.2d 134 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Balme v. Gold-Bro, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

277 A.2d 134 (1971)

Jennie BALME et al.
v.
GOLD-BRO, INC.

No. 1406-M. P.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

May 13, 1971.

William G. Gilroy, Providence, for petitioners.

Hinckley, Allen, Salisbury & Parsons, James K. Irvin, Providence, for respondent.

ORDER

The denial of a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory in nature and not finally dispositive of the case and, absent peculiar circumstances, is not appealable under principles applicable in Rhode Island. Any error in denying summary judgment is rendered harmless by a fair determination of the merits at a trial. See 1 Kent, R.I.Civ.Prac., § 56.12.

The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.